Forums :: Resources :: Features :: Photo Gallery :: Vintage Radio Shows :: Archives :: Books
Support This Site: The Souvenir Shop :: Contributors :: Advertise


It is currently May Thu 23, 2013 10:51 am


All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post New Topic Post Reply  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Jul Thu 21, 2011 10:07 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am
Posts: 9159
Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
(moderators: if this belongs elsewhere please move it)

I originally entered this text as a reply in a thread about AC dropper-caps and resistors and decided that perhaps it should have its own separate heading.
I also would love feed back and to see experimentation from anyone else to improve or perfect this idea.


In the interest of trying to find a simple and cheap, easy way to drop the normal 125v input AC down to something closer to 105VAC or so for use feeding the old power transformers. (instead of a bucking transformer)
... I decided to play "Edison" tonight and see what I could "blow-up"...lol

So I thought about making a capacitor voltage divider in front of .. or prior to the transformer .

So I tried out a bread-board circuit with a few trial components and it all SEEMS to have worked great... so far..... lol

I used a 115/10vAC door-bell-transformer and connected the 2ndary to two #47 lamps in series at the 2ndary load. ( should be 150ma load)

When I feed a NORMAL 125VAC into the primary I get about 15vAC out on the secondary across the 2 lamps in series... OKAY fine.

Then I made a Capacitor voltage divider by connecting an 8.2uf AC cap in series with a 2.5uf AC cap.

This seems like about an 80:20 ratio.... right? (I don't know if my thinking is clear on that logic)
Image
Anyway .... I went on to feed 125 VAC across the entire divider.
Then I connected the transformer across only the 2.5uf (shunt) cap to feed the primary.

The 125vAC feed drops down to 105vAC across the 2.5uf cap... thereby loosing 20vAC with no heat loss!!

Feeding the transformer with 105vAC now ... it dropped the secondary output down to 12vAc... fine!

The total current feeding the whole divider is about 72ma and the current feeding the transformer primary from across the 2.5uf cap is 42ma

Seems like a good idea... no? ... Or am I just simply "lucky" that the primary does not oscillate with the 2.5uf cap?

My example is using relatively low current loads... so I'm not exactly sure that if a much larger load would require much larger value caps.
... and if so, it may not be practical to buy the much larger-sized AC caps compared to the cost of a bucking transformer.
Note update: To drop the 125volts down to only 112vAC instead of 105VAC ....I decided to change the cap values to 8uf and 1uf to achieve a result closer to 112vAC. That worked perfectly.
Then with 112VAC feeding the transformer I decided to increase the secondary load considerably to see if these particular values could be used to drive a heavier load. So I increased the load on the secondary of the transformer to approximately 600ma (using 3 paralleled sets of two #51 bulbs in series. Each 2-bulb series-set draws 200ma)
At this point the load was drawing 600ma and the primary was drawing only about 110ma.

Here's a note I just found on simple capacitor voltage divider theory:
.. (I've shown approximately the same example values as in my circuit pictured above 8uf and 2uf)
"Capacitive dividers can be used with AC input signals. A DC input voltage would not pass through the capacitors, so the DC case is not relevant. The formula for determining the AC output voltage of a capacitive divider is different from the resistive and inductive dividers, because the series element, C1 is in the numerator instead of the shunt element, as shown below:

Vout = Vin * C1/(C1+C2) ...... where C1= 8uf and C2=2uf

Example: In the following circuit, the output voltage would be: Vout = 125VAC * 8uF / (8uF + 2uF) = 100VAC. Note that the output voltage is not dependent on the input frequency. However, if the reactance of the capacitors is not large at the frequency of interest (i.e. capacitance not large enough), the output current capability will be very low. "

_________________
" To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing is as sacred as integrity of your own mind." Emerson


Last edited by Pbpix on Aug Mon 15, 2011 5:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Jul Thu 21, 2011 10:23 pm 
Member

Joined: May Tue 30, 2006 4:46 pm
Posts: 4806
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Maybe I am missing something.

What's the advantage of two caps in a divider vs. one series cap "dropper?" Seems like extra cost and space needed?

Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Jul Thu 21, 2011 11:26 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am
Posts: 9159
Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
Rich, W3HWJ wrote:
Maybe I am missing something.

What's the advantage of two caps in a divider vs. one series cap "dropper?" Seems like extra cost and space needed?

Rich


Hi Rich:
The problem is that 1 cap in series with (an inductor) the transformer will oscillate like crazy.

_________________
" To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing is as sacred as integrity of your own mind." Emerson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Jul Fri 22, 2011 4:40 am 
Member

Joined: May Tue 30, 2006 4:46 pm
Posts: 4806
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Hmmm... hadn't thought of that.

Even if you select an L-C combo that is not resonant at any multiple of 60 Hz???

Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Jul Fri 22, 2011 4:50 am 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am
Posts: 9159
Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
Rich, W3HWJ wrote:
Hmmm... hadn't thought of that.

Even if you select an L-C combo that is not resonant at any multiple of 60 Hz???

Rich

Maybe... but not sure how to do that with the correct end result desired drop voltage in mind.

... but maybe it would work... try it out and see what you can come up with.

_________________
" To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing is as sacred as integrity of your own mind." Emerson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Aug Sun 14, 2011 5:16 pm 
Member

Joined: Jun Mon 20, 2011 6:09 pm
Posts: 228
Location: N Cen Mn
This an interesting experiment and I'm impressed with it enough to learn more. I think it would be nice to put a varying load to simulate real conditions and measure the input voltage.
A real live tube radio would work. Just turn the volume up and down and see what happens at the input.

_________________
Prediction is difficult, especially about the future. Niels Bohr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Aug Mon 15, 2011 5:35 am 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am
Posts: 9159
Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
Phil Coe wrote:
This an interesting experiment and I'm impressed with it enough to learn more. I think it would be nice to put a varying load to simulate real conditions and measure the input voltage.
A real live tube radio would work. Just turn the volume up and down and see what happens at the input.

Hi Phil:
I encourage you to experiment as I've been doing. It's a real learning experience and it's fun too.

I don't think that just varying the volume on a radio would be much of a load change or variation.

_________________
" To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing is as sacred as integrity of your own mind." Emerson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Experiment for Bucking transformer alternative
PostPosted: Aug Mon 15, 2011 6:47 pm 
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am
Posts: 12215
Location: Somers, CT
Most radios have single ended audio output stages which are
Class A. Even Philco used Class A in the majority of their sets
that had push-pull audio output stages. If varying the
volume has anything but an minor effect on the current draw
there is something wrong with the set.

Pete

_________________
A long journey always begins with the words, "I think I know a shortcut."


Top
 Profile  
 
Post New Topic Post Reply  [ 8 posts ]  Moderator: Chuck Schwark

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



Search for:
Jump to:  










Privacy Policy :: Powered by phpBB