| Author |
Message |
|
Big Harry
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 3:05 pm |
|
Joined: Nov Wed 07, 2007 12:44 am Posts: 1639 Location: Hawthorne, Ca
|
|
My Bozak Concert Grands were built in 1974 as I bought them new and my B401 Rhapsody's were built in 1975 so that makes them 70's speakers. Harry
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jmsent
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 3:39 pm |
|
Joined: Aug Sat 01, 2009 2:23 pm Posts: 466
|
|
I was referring more to the design period than the build date. The Concert Grands are a 1950's design. AR3a's were also available in the 70's, but their design was a product of 1960's technology and R&D.
_________________ John Stone Speaker Nerd-German Radio Fan
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubes4life
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 4:59 pm |
|
Joined: Aug Tue 24, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 2915 Location: Florida
|
jmsent wrote: The only connection between the Advent of the 70's and that of the 90's is the name. The original Advent Corp. was started by Henry Kloss, who was a co-founder of KLH and also worked at AR. He was a brilliant engineer and had that unique ability to get the most performance from audio products at a reasonable price. The Large Advent speaker was truly a breakthrough product that gave the industry standards (like the AR3a) a run for their money. He sold many hundreds of thousands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_KlossAdvent went bankrupt in 1981 and Kloss had no involvement in it after that time. The Advent name was purchased by International Jensen that also owned companies like NHT, Phase Linear, and a bunch of others. Products with the Advent name from this era and beyond were unmemorable, "design by committee" type products that never came close to the innovative products from the Kloss era. Now that would explain things. Obviously by the time the 90's came around, performance was an afterthought.
_________________ William
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Don Cavey
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 6:05 pm |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 9819 Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
|
tubes4life wrote: ... Now that would explain things. Obviously by the time the 90's came around, performance was an afterthought. And a recognized name was everything. I get a sick feeling when I see stuff today with names like KLH, Fisher, Scott, Westinghouse, RCA etc...
_________________ Don
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubes4life
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 6:13 pm |
|
Joined: Aug Tue 24, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 2915 Location: Florida
|
Don Cavey wrote: tubes4life wrote: ... Now that would explain things. Obviously by the time the 90's came around, performance was an afterthought. And a recognized name was everything. I get a sick feeling when I see stuff today with names like KLH, Fisher, Scott, Westinghouse, RCA etc... Amen...it really is awful. My experience with buying those speakers proves a point; companies today sucker people in with brand recognition. Next time I will be careful to do my homework.
_________________ William
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Don Cavey
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 7:05 pm |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 9819 Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
|
|
I was "tricked" in the 90s into buying some speaker that have foam surrounds. Even good names like Bang & Olufsen use them in their CX-50/CX-100 speakers. Small bass drivers that are uniformly rotted out. These guys command a premium price even with the foam rotted. I did get a few and have started to replace the surround but have not finished. Now, I won't touch a speaker that has a foam surround. Cloth, paper and especially butyl rubber is just fine after 30 years...
_________________ Don
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jmsent
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 7:39 pm |
|
Joined: Aug Sat 01, 2009 2:23 pm Posts: 466
|
The foam surrounds have acoustical properties that you can't get in natural rubber or paper. They are very light in weight and very stable while at the same time being very "lossy". This is a very good combination of characteristics when a woofer is being used up fairly high in frequency. Of course, given that the material is polyurethane, it's subject to oxidation; hence the "rot". I don't think the severity of this problem was well understood in the 70's-90's when this material was almost universally used in woofer surrounds. My company (SEAS) is using a new type of foam surround in a full-range driver that we build, that uses natural rubber as the material. It has all the good characteristics and will never rot. http://seas.no/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=293&Itemid=255
_________________ John Stone Speaker Nerd-German Radio Fan
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubes4life
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 8:03 pm |
|
Joined: Aug Tue 24, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 2915 Location: Florida
|
Don Cavey wrote: I was "tricked" in the 90s into buying some speaker that have foam surrounds. Even good names like Bang & Olufsen use them in their CX-50/CX-100 speakers. Small bass drivers that are uniformly rotted out. These guys command a premium price even with the foam rotted. I did get a few and have started to replace the surround but have not finished. Now, I won't touch a speaker that has a foam surround. Cloth, paper and especially butyl rubber is just fine after 30 years... Ditto, no foam surrounds! But have you ever tried replacing them? Every tutorial I see makes it look easy, but I have my doubts.
_________________ William
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Don Cavey
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 8:11 pm |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 9819 Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
|
I have gotten the surrounds for the B&O CX-100 speakers. Got the dust cover off of the VC, cleaned the old surround off of the cone and cemented the new surround to the cone. I have not had chance to cement the surround to the basket yet. Takes a lot of time and I don't have that right now. And, I have 14 speakers to do 
_________________ Don
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubes4life
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 9:06 pm |
|
Joined: Aug Tue 24, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 2915 Location: Florida
|
Don Cavey wrote: I have gotten the surrounds for the B&O CX-100 speakers. Got the dust cover off of the VC, cleaned the old surround off of the cone and cemented the new surround to the cone. I have not had chance to cement the surround to the basket yet. Takes a lot of time and I don't have that right now. And, I have 14 speakers to do  14 speakers? 
_________________ William
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dberman51
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Thu 15, 2011 9:19 pm |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 2309 Location: Boston, MA USA
|
Don Cavey wrote: I have gotten the surrounds for the B&O CX-100 speakers. Got the dust cover off of the VC, cleaned the old surround off of the cone and cemented the new surround to the cone. I have not had chance to cement the surround to the basket yet. Takes a lot of time and I don't have that right now. And, I have 14 speakers to do  I have done the surrounds on a pair of Infinity speakers. Came out very successfully but one of them took two tries. There are two kinds of kits -- one with just glue and surround, one which adds shims to space the voice coil properly and includes new dust caps, since you must destroy the old dust cap to place the shims. The key to getting this right is that the voice coil clearance to the magnet must be exactly correct. So I would only use the type of kit that includes the shims. But the shims must fit properly -- firmly enough to secure the voice coil in the proper location, but not so tight that it distorts the voice coil. One of the Infinity drivers worked well and came out perfectly, but the other one had a tighter clearance. I made the mistake of forcing the shims into place, which actually set the voice coil off-center. After the glue had dried I tried the speaker and found the voice coil dragging badly. Luckily I hadn't glued the gasket yet, so I was able to slowly remove the surround from the speaker basket and try again, making up my own shims from thinner plastic material. Second time was the charm. So yes, it can be done, but it is a bit tedious and you need to be careful. -David
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
wwcarey
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 12:55 am |
|
Joined: May Tue 09, 2006 11:31 pm Posts: 576 Location: Jamestown NY 14701
|
|
I really like my Klipsch belle's, Avid 330's, and yes my B.I.C. formula 1S! Powered by a Kenwood KR9600 reciever at home.
At work Lafayette pip-speaks, And the mother of kabuki speakers the Kenwood KZ10000Z monsters mounted to the wall. Powered by a Kenwood KR7400 reciever and a sony 300 cd changer.
dave
_________________ When told that Steve Jobs bought a CRAY to help design the next Apple, Seymour Cray said, "Funny, I am using an Apple to simulate the CRAY-3."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Don Cavey
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 1:10 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 9819 Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
|
|
As for the surrounds, I did remove the dust cap so that I could shim it. I found that three strips of a business card was just about the exact thickness to shim the voice coil from the magnet pole. Just gotta have time to finish the job...
_________________ Don
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubes4life
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 1:50 am |
|
Joined: Aug Tue 24, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 2915 Location: Florida
|
I dunno, guys...seems like very meticulous work. I think if I ever need that done, I'll leave it to a professional 
_________________ William
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Don Cavey
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 1:55 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 9819 Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
|
tubes4life wrote: Don Cavey wrote: I have gotten the surrounds for the B&O CX-100 speakers. Got the dust cover off of the VC, cleaned the old surround off of the cone and cemented the new surround to the cone. I have not had chance to cement the surround to the basket yet. Takes a lot of time and I don't have that right now. And, I have 14 speakers to do  14 speakers?  Yeah, two in each CX-100 and one in each CX-50. Needless to say, I have a few. Future intentions are to use for Computer speakers among other things...
_________________ Don
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RepairTech
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 2:01 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Sun 24, 2010 7:59 am Posts: 6171 Location: Pro Tech, Philadelphia Pa.
|
jmsent wrote: The foam surrounds have acoustical properties that you can't get in natural rubber or paper. They are very light in weight and very stable while at the same time being very "lossy". This is a very good combination of characteristics when a woofer is being used up fairly high in frequency. Of course, given that the material is polyurethane, it's subject to oxidation; hence the "rot". I don't think the severity of this problem was well understood in the 70's-90's when this material was almost universally used in woofer surrounds. My company (SEAS) is using a new type of foam surround in a full-range driver that we build, that uses natural rubber as the material. It has all the good characteristics and will never rot. http://seas.no/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=293&Itemid=255My pair of Smaller Advents purchased new in 1977 eventually rotted out. The Advent Maestro's I purchased in 1987 rotted out too by 1999. Oddly, Radio Shack carried a mean-looking 10" woofer at the time - 4 ohms, and had a butyl foam surround with impressive specs. - I purchased two and installed them in the Maestros. At the time I think they were $80 each - and on half-price sale, so I had to grab them. Wonderful performance! Even smoother bass! They're called "Pro Series" and to this day they're fantastic drivers. Edit: found a photo of them. 
_________________ "Accept the fact that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue."
Last edited by RepairTech on Dec Fri 16, 2011 2:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubes4life
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 2:02 am |
|
Joined: Aug Tue 24, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 2915 Location: Florida
|
|
Don, have you ever wondered whether or not it might be worth it to buy new woofers (or good used ones) as opposed to reconing? It's something I've wrestled with...I see pros and cons on each side.
_________________ William
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RepairTech
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 2:03 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Sun 24, 2010 7:59 am Posts: 6171 Location: Pro Tech, Philadelphia Pa.
|
tubes4life wrote: I dunno, guys...seems like very meticulous work. I think if I ever need that done, I'll leave it to a professional  I've done new foam surrounds - t'aint that difficult if you have a steady hand. 
_________________ "Accept the fact that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubes4life
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 2:05 am |
|
Joined: Aug Tue 24, 2010 8:56 pm Posts: 2915 Location: Florida
|
RepairTech wrote: tubes4life wrote: I dunno, guys...seems like very meticulous work. I think if I ever need that done, I'll leave it to a professional  I've done new foam surrounds - t'aint that difficult if you have a steady hand.  But wouldn't that mean I'd have to give up the drinking? 
_________________ William
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RepairTech
|
Post subject: Re: What's your favorite 70's speaker? Posted: Dec Fri 16, 2011 2:14 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Sun 24, 2010 7:59 am Posts: 6171 Location: Pro Tech, Philadelphia Pa.
|
tubes4life wrote: RepairTech wrote: tubes4life wrote: I dunno, guys...seems like very meticulous work. I think if I ever need that done, I'll leave it to a professional  I've done new foam surrounds - t'aint that difficult if you have a steady hand.  But wouldn't that mean I'd have to give up the drinking?  Indubidibly. 
_________________ "Accept the fact that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
|