|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Larry Hillis
|
Post subject: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Thu 26, 2012 5:18 pm |
|
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Apr Wed 09, 2008 3:37 am Posts: 9840 Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
|
Wow, look at this fantastic pair of RCA Victor New Orthophonic amplifiers, made in Great Britain! They are absolutely gorgeous, but I wonder how they would sound? The model number of each amplifier is LMI-32116A and the seller says they are theatre grade amplifiers made for the home market. The seller says each amp only puts out 12 watts of output power, so the two of them together may not be as potent as my 1956 RCA Victor Mark I. They are very nice, however, and rather expensive at $4,200 for the pair. It would be interesting to borrow them for a few days to find out how they sound! Look at how RCA lined up all the capacitors and resistors in these amps. Recapping would be a breeze. http://www.ebay.com/itm/RCA-LMI-32216-P ... 231fa92fad
| Attachments: |

$T2eC16hHJIkE9qU3l38tBP+cR1vPB!~~60_57.JPG [ 319.95 KiB | Viewed 177 times ]
|
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dberman51
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Thu 26, 2012 11:13 pm |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 2334 Location: Boston, MA USA
|
|
Seems to me that a pair of KT66s along with those hefty transformers should be good for 40 watts, not 12.
-David
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Larry Hillis
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Fri 27, 2012 2:36 am |
|
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Apr Wed 09, 2008 3:37 am Posts: 9840 Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
|
dberman51 wrote: Seems to me that a pair of KT66s along with those hefty transformers should be good for 40 watts, not 12.
-David Now, that is fairly potent.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
tubeAMP
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Fri 27, 2012 7:21 pm |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 2817 Location: Gainesville, Florida
|
|
nice but not four thousand dollars nice
_________________ CAUTION: Im no expert
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
walyfd
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Fri 27, 2012 7:39 pm |
|
Joined: Apr Thu 28, 2011 5:48 pm Posts: 208
|
|
They'd make interesting bookends. They look more like art than amps.
How long did RCA build things in the UK? Rolls Royces were built in Springfield, Mass from '26-'31 but it didn't work out very well. Buyers wanted the real deal--had to be British.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Larry Hillis
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Fri 27, 2012 8:55 pm |
|
| Moderator |
 |
Joined: Apr Wed 09, 2008 3:37 am Posts: 9840 Location: Little Rock, Arkansas
|
walyfd wrote: They'd make interesting bookends. They look more like art than amps.
How long did RCA build things in the UK? Rolls Royces were built in Springfield, Mass from '26-'31 but it didn't work out very well. Buyers wanted the real deal--had to be British. I wouldn't know, but RCA did have a division in the UK. They may have made Canadian models there as well, but I can't say for certain. I do know the Canadian models were quite different than the USA models.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Eric H
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Sat 28, 2012 7:00 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 5726 Location: Redlands CA
|
walyfd wrote: They'd make interesting bookends. They look more like art than amps.
How long did RCA build things in the UK? Rolls Royces were built in Springfield, Mass from '26-'31 but it didn't work out very well. Buyers wanted the real deal--had to be British. Wanted that oil leak eh? 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dberman51
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Sat 28, 2012 5:46 pm |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 2334 Location: Boston, MA USA
|
walyfd wrote: How long did RCA build things in the UK? Rolls Royces were built in Springfield, Mass from '26-'31 but it didn't work out very well. Buyers wanted the real deal--had to be British. The cars were excellent quality and very successful with customers. They sold a lot of them. But RR lost money on every one, and when the 1929 crash wiped out the market for luxury cars the decision was made to close down the American operation. -David
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
mpatoray
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Jul Sun 29, 2012 5:15 am |
|
Joined: Dec Mon 28, 2009 1:21 am Posts: 147 Location: New Middletown, OH
|
|
Those resistors and caps on the terminal block reminds me of the construction of RCA TV cameras of the time like the TK-31 and TK-41.
Very nice amps for sure, it would be interesting to see how they sounded.
Matt
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Lou deGonzague
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Aug Wed 01, 2012 12:21 am |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 7083 Location: Latham NY
|
|
Those are real beauties price aside. That power rating would be very conservative. With the right speakers I'm sure they would make a lot of good clean sound.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
dfms
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Apr Wed 03, 2013 12:24 pm |
|
| New Member |
 |
Joined: Jul Fri 27, 2012 9:22 pm Posts: 9 Location: Denmark
|
Larry Hillis wrote: find out how they sound! They sound absolutely wonderful. But buying these amps. would be foolish: The color is not correct. Output tubes it not KT66. There are still old capacitors in them (Hunts). Seller is a little too smart, the amplifiers is only 300-400 U.S. dollars worth ! Here is a real RCA Orthophonic amplifier: (Moderator's note: Reduced the picture to fit the page better. Original was way too wide...)
| Attachments: |

rca orthophonic - lmi-32216a.jpg [ 180.66 KiB | Viewed 178 times ]
|
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
jmsent
|
Post subject: Re: For the Most Discriminating New Orthophonic Collector... Posted: Apr Wed 03, 2013 7:49 pm |
|
Joined: Aug Sat 01, 2009 2:23 pm Posts: 474
|
dberman51 wrote: Seems to me that a pair of KT66s along with those hefty transformers should be good for 40 watts, not 12.
-David Unless they're biased pure class A . Then 12 watts is not unreasonable.
_________________ John Stone Speaker Nerd-German Radio Fan
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
|
|