| Author |
Message |
|
RepairTech
|
Post subject: Posted: Jan Wed 27, 2010 2:02 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Sun 24, 2010 7:59 am Posts: 6171 Location: Pro Tech, Philadelphia Pa.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Hi-Fi in Fiberglass
|
Post subject: Re: Cleaning old records Posted: Feb Tue 02, 2010 6:13 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Fri 16, 2009 12:26 am Posts: 512 Location: The Twilight Zone
|
ussmarshal wrote: I use WD-40
This has to be a joke,right?
Why would you want to cover a record with an oily coating that attracts dirt?
What next? PAM?,slick 50?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
frenchmarky
|
Post subject: Posted: Feb Tue 23, 2010 3:28 am |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 373 Location: moreno valley
|
|
I just take a record to the kitchen sink, quickly clean both sides with mild dish soap and a 'hard' toothbrush, rinse, towel dry completely, then let dry fully till next day because the surface will absorb some water and soften up, even if it looks and feels dry. I run the brush around and around the grooves, back and forth vigorously to pull out all the crud that I can.
I can't imagine even the stiffest toothbrush bristles could cause any harm whatsoever, since the grooves are designed to eat away at a STEEL needle. Anyway this is what I do with my 20s-30s records and seems to do the job.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Bill Yacey
|
Post subject: Re: Cleaning old records Posted: May Fri 14, 2010 7:11 pm |
|
Joined: Sep Mon 01, 2008 6:05 pm Posts: 257 Location: Alberta, Canada
|
Hi-Fi in Fiberglass wrote: ussmarshal wrote: I use WD-40 This has to be a joke,right? Why would you want to cover a record with an oily coating that attracts dirt? What next? PAM?,slick 50?
Ditto on the concoction with Murphy's Oil Soap. This leaves an oil residue as well.
_________________ Alignment Instructions:
1) Adjust C158 trimmer for least smoke
2) Increase bias until plates are no longer flame orange.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
gramophoneshane
|
Post subject: Re: Cleaning old records Posted: May Fri 14, 2010 7:57 pm |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Apr Sat 12, 2008 8:44 pm Posts: 1021 Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
|
Hi-Fi in Fiberglass wrote: ussmarshal wrote: I use WD-40 This has to be a joke,right? Why would you want to cover a record with an oily coating that attracts dirt? What next? PAM?,slick 50?
Pledge is another one I've heard of being used on 78s and vinyl, although some guys who are usually against using anything on records besides soap & water, have said Pledge is useful on acetate discs. They seem to think it helps trap oils in the lacquer & prevents it drying out, but I'm still not convinced 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
frenchmarky
|
Post subject: Posted: May Fri 14, 2010 9:21 pm |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 373 Location: moreno valley
|
|
On the topic of toothbrushes, recently I decided to check the bristle thickness of all the junky old toothbrushes I had laying around - so I'd know if the bristles were actually able to dig all the way down into the grooves. Used my handy dandy micrometer. I only found ONE that had bristles in the .006" range, a Crest brush, so that's the one I now use to clean all my newly acquired 78s. Rest of the brushes had bristles of .007" and greater, while your average record groove is around .0065" wide from the top of each wall. The bristle size probably just corresponds to whether the brush is soft, medium, etc.
On a few junky, noisy records, I've gone so far as to experiment with using regular old carnuba wax to clean the records, using a toothbrush also. The distillates in it probably aren't good for the record but what the heck, I was just playing around. I let it dry, then buffed shiny. A few plays cleaned all the dry wax out of the grooves, hopefully along with other crud that was in there. I was able to notice a slight reduction in the volume of the backround hiss of the records, which was easier to discern just by only waxing half of the record. But along with the probably ills of using wax in the first place, playing it the first couple of times left a waxy dust that had to be wiped off.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RepairTech
|
Post subject: Posted: May Sat 15, 2010 12:29 am |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Sun 24, 2010 7:59 am Posts: 6171 Location: Pro Tech, Philadelphia Pa.
|
frenchmarky wrote: On the topic of toothbrushes, recently I decided to check the bristle thickness of all the junky old toothbrushes I had laying around - so I'd know if the bristles were actually able to dig all the way down into the grooves. Used my handy dandy micrometer. I only found ONE that had bristles in the .006" range, a Crest brush, so that's the one I now use to clean all my newly acquired 78s. Rest of the brushes had bristles of .007" and greater, while your average record groove is around .0065" wide from the top of each wall. The bristle size probably just corresponds to whether the brush is soft, medium, etc.
On a few junky, noisy records, I've gone so far as to experiment with using regular old carnuba wax to clean the records, using a toothbrush also. The distillates in it probably aren't good for the record but what the heck, I was just playing around. I let it dry, then buffed shiny. A few plays cleaned all the dry wax out of the grooves, hopefully along with other crud that was in there. I was able to notice a slight reduction in the volume of the backround hiss of the records, which was easier to discern just by only waxing half of the record. But along with the probably ills of using wax in the first place, playing it the first couple of times left a waxy dust that had to be wiped off.
Anthing that leaves a residue isn't good for the record or sound.
Clogging up the very small undulations of high frequencies would hurt the whole musical experience.
_________________ "Accept the fact that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
frenchmarky
|
Post subject: Posted: May Sat 15, 2010 1:43 am |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 373 Location: moreno valley
|
|
<<Anthing that leaves a residue isn't good for the record or sound.
Clogging up the very small undulations of high frequencies would hurt the whole musical experience.>>
Hopefully between the multiple buffings and the needle conforming to the groove and scraping out any remaining wax, there shouldn't be much, if any left where it would affect the sound. I only did this to a couple of records that are worn to heck and I don't even like anyway, the rest of my near-worthless collection I clean only. From what I see I don't recommend it, and who knows what harm the solvents in the wax might do the short time I had them on there.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Ken Doyle
|
Post subject: Posted: May Sat 15, 2010 3:11 am |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 1543 Location: Haledon NJ USA
|
|
Sometimes you have a really worn record, say a Columbia from around 1910, that's so worn and grey that the friction slows your Victrola's turntable. In this case Pledge Furniture polish will allow the record to play. I'd never put it on good condition records.
Ken D.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
frenchmarky
|
Post subject: Posted: May Sun 16, 2010 5:44 pm |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 373 Location: moreno valley
|
|
Speaking of records slowing the turntable, I had an incident like that a few weeks ago with one particular Harmony brand record. Slapped it on my vv-210 and it would immediately start to slow down all the way to a stop, even when fully wound.
I jumped to the conclusion there was a problem with the machine, like the springs sticking. But that was very unlikely, given that I cleaned and regreased the springs a couple of years ago. Turned out it was ONLY happening with this one record, it totally blew me away. The record looks and sounds fine, and is in the same condition as several other Harmonys I have that have no problems whatsoever. It's almost as if this one record has some invisible friction-causing material in the grooves. Never have figured out exactly what the cause is. I'll see if I can dig that disc up and try cleaning it real good and try again.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
pugs5061
|
Post subject: Posted: Jun Wed 09, 2010 8:21 am |
|
Joined: May Sat 08, 2010 2:16 am Posts: 19 Location: Barrington, Illinois
|
|
One of the best methods on really dirty records is carpenters glue! Vinyl only, no 78's. I believe Tightbond 2 is the preferred glue. A very thin coat and peal it up. It is one of the best ways to get the dirt out of the bottom of the grooves. There is a full multi page thread on the subject at Audiokarma. Tried it on a record that was literally about to go in the trash and it does work. Do this at your own risk though and remember it still doesn't fix scratches.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
RepairTech
|
Post subject: Posted: Jun Wed 09, 2010 5:08 pm |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Sun 24, 2010 7:59 am Posts: 6171 Location: Pro Tech, Philadelphia Pa.
|
pugs5061 wrote: One of the best methods on really dirty records is carpenters glue! Vinyl only, no 78's. I believe Tightbond 2 is the preferred glue. A very thin coat and peal it up. It is one of the best ways to get the dirt out of the bottom of the grooves. There is a full multi page thread on the subject at Audiokarma. Tried it on a record that was literally about to go in the trash and it does work. Do this at your own risk though and remember it still doesn't fix scratches.
Um, you go ahead and waste that glue.
Those weirdos at AudioPhool crack me up.
They're a silly bunch, eh? 
_________________ "Accept the fact that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
frenchmarky
|
Post subject: Posted: Jun Sun 13, 2010 8:53 am |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 373 Location: moreno valley
|
|
I'd guess something like that glue would remove some dirt, but I still think real old non-vinyl records that have had multiple layers of crud scraped into the grooves over and over again over 80 years really need to have those grooves scrubbed out. With a brush and either a special cleaner or soap and water. The thicker the crud, the more the glue is only going to stick to the outer surface and leave lots of crud behind, right? And when you pull the glue up, it would have some junk on it but who knows how much it left behind?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
morbious_fod
|
Post subject: Posted: Jun Mon 21, 2010 5:36 am |
|
Joined: Jun Mon 21, 2010 4:47 am Posts: 13 Location: Abingdon, VA
|
|
A friend of mine who has been collecting records much longer than I have actually plays them and lightly squirts water on the vinyl while playing and let's the needle do the work then cleans off the excess. I've never personally tried this myself, but I have seen him do it several times, and it seems to work pretty well.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Chirpolo
|
Post subject: Posted: Jun Mon 21, 2010 8:21 am |
|
Joined: Jul Mon 13, 2009 3:15 am Posts: 513 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
What about using an air compressor to blast the grime out?
_________________ VK2FBAH
Studying for my advanced-grade ham licence.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
DarrenWGaransi
|
Post subject: Posted: Jun Tue 22, 2010 4:41 am |
|
Joined: May Tue 01, 2007 4:01 am Posts: 883 Location: Hamilton Square, New Jersey
|
|
How about taking a face mask, letting it dry and then peeling it off?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
frenchmarky
|
Post subject: Posted: Jun Wed 23, 2010 11:53 pm |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 373 Location: moreno valley
|
morbious_fod wrote: A friend of mine who has been collecting records much longer than I have actually plays them and lightly squirts water on the vinyl while playing and let's the needle do the work then cleans off the excess. I've never personally tried this myself, but I have seen him do it several times, and it seems to work pretty well.
Just to reiterate, this would not apply to older non-vinyl records, which may absorb the water.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
ksk
|
Post subject: Posted: Aug Wed 18, 2010 2:13 pm |
|
Joined: Jul Tue 20, 2010 8:07 pm Posts: 220 Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
D R FORD
|
Post subject: Posted: Nov Sat 20, 2010 5:05 am |
|
Joined: Aug Sun 22, 2010 5:02 am Posts: 138 Location: canton ill
|
|
you might want to check out this site The Talking Machine Forum about your records and cylinders. i was looking on there yesterday and was surprised to find that some make there own blank cylinders
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
morbious_fod
|
Post subject: Posted: Dec Sun 05, 2010 9:13 pm |
|
Joined: Jun Mon 21, 2010 4:47 am Posts: 13 Location: Abingdon, VA
|
frenchmarky wrote: morbious_fod wrote: A friend of mine who has been collecting records much longer than I have actually plays them and lightly squirts water on the vinyl while playing and let's the needle do the work then cleans off the excess. I've never personally tried this myself, but I have seen him do it several times, and it seems to work pretty well. Just to reiterate, this would not apply to older non-vinyl records, which may absorb the water.
Sorry I didn't think about non-vinyl records. I nor my friend have ever owned any records that weren't vinyl.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
|