Antique Radio Forums :: View topic - Prius
Forums :: Resources :: Features :: Photo Gallery :: Vintage Radio Shows :: Archives :: Books :: Value Guide :: Wiki  Support This Site: Contributors

Radio Showroom
 Forum Rules/FAQ   Posting Photos   Search     Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 

Prius Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Antique Radio Forums Forum Index -> Radio Clubhouse
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OZ132HOME
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 4141
Location: La Porte, IN, USA

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 1:10 pm  Reply with quote

Thanks, Peter. Didn't buy the car to join the snob club, or anything. Just a car... Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kent Kershaw
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 752
Location: Charlotte,NC

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 3:10 pm  Reply with quote

I saw part of a car show on BBC America and they tested a BMW M3 and a Prius side by side on a closed course. I think they had the Prius set the pace. The BMW got better gas mileage. Their point was it's not what you drive, but how you drive.

I forget where I saw it, But there was a story on the carbon footprint of the manufacture of the Prius's batteries. It starts in Sudbury, Ontario, a place supposedly heavily damaged by acid rain from the smelters near the nickel mines, and literally circles the globe as the nickel gets refined and manufactured into batteries in different places, to Japan, where the batteries are installed in the cars, and then shipped to the USA and Canada.

I also saw that Car and Driver article, and was amazed by the performance of the Hybrids. I would never have thought that they went like that. I would have thought that the Metro would have performed the same or better.

Scared behind the wheel? Let's see, there I was, fat, dumb and happy behind the wheel of my '63 409 Impala Super Sport. One hand on the wheel, the other elbow sticking out the window. Too cool!! I floored it. At that moment, the driver's bucket-seat back "went adrift". I managed to keep it on the road and get it stopped. I must have looked funny driving home with the wheel white-knuckled to my chest. You don't appreciate a seat back until you don't have one. Not only does it help keep you out of the back seat during acceleration, it also helps keep your butt in place around curves. I wish I still had that car.
View user's profile Send private message
terry h
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 7367
Location: Valley City ND USA

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 3:59 pm  Reply with quote

Your old car is high on my "wanna have one" list Kent. I had a plain vanilla 63 Impala. Was a very good car for me.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
35Z5
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 6142
Location: Chesapeake VA

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 5:31 pm  Reply with quote

Yeah most everyone thinks of the 409 Impala SS as a screaming, hairy chested, monster but a fellow I know had one with 340Hp(I believe thats correct) hydraulic cam engine and a Powerglide... While it wasn't slow, wasn't a match for my 428 Cobra Jet Torino...

Tom
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Samham
Member


Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1318
Location: DC metro (Maryland)

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 5:31 pm  Reply with quote

My last year in Grad School (1963) , I had a '57 Nash (factory 3-color paint job -- dark brown.light bown, and coral pink!) with the collapsing seat back feature just like Kent experienced -- except I couldn't afford to fix mine properly. I had a brace, "T"-shaped, made of old leaf spring stock which worked most of the time. But when I hit a bump, down it went. Very embarrassing on a date.

I eventually replaced it with a '57 Merc "Turnpike Cruiser" with push button tranny selector. Kept that car until I had been on active army duty for a while and could actually afford to buy my first new car.


Last edited by Samham on Jul Mon 06, 2009 7:26 pm
View user's profile Send private message
terry h
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 7367
Location: Valley City ND USA

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 6:22 pm  Reply with quote

35Z5 wrote:
Yeah most everyone thinks of the 409 Impala SS as a screaming, hairy chested, monster but a fellow I know had one with 340Hp(I believe thats correct) hydraulic cam engine and a Powerglide... While it wasn't slow, wasn't a match for my 428 Cobra Jet Torino...

Tom


A fellow I know was friends with the kid who's dad had the local Olds/Cad. dealership. There was a 63 Chev. convert with 409 P.Glide on the lot. Had the dual quads.

The boys would sneak it off the lot when they could. When the glide would shift up, the tires would break loose and screech. They were thrilled!

I don't recall if they ever got caught? I know they were too young to have a drivers license. Smile
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Burnt Fingers
Member


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 5683
Location: New Hampshire

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 10:41 pm  Reply with quote

I dont believe the 425 HP version was available with the PigGlide.

I had a 409 Impala wagon with the 400 hp and 4 spd. It was one of the nine 63's I had over several years when they were at bottom dollar. Being a wagon it was a real sleeper. Sold that one for parts when a drunk tailended me and buckled the frame on both sides. But my favorite 63 was a SS HT with a blueprinted 350 that was good for around the same power. Put a lot of miles on that one until the body and frame rotted out.

Carl
View user's profile Send private message
Burnt Fingers
Member


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 5683
Location: New Hampshire

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 10:44 pm  Reply with quote

What is it with Prius drivers running with the lights off during the day? Is it another way of squeezing the best mpg? Id say that 50% of the ones I see are running dark.

Carl
View user's profile Send private message
terry h
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 7367
Location: Valley City ND USA

Posted: Jul Mon 06, 2009 11:55 pm  Reply with quote

Burnt Fingers wrote:
I dont believe the 425 HP version was available with the PigGlide.

I had a 409 Impala wagon with the 400 hp and 4 spd. It was one of the nine 63's I had over several years when they were at bottom dollar. Being a wagon it was a real sleeper. Sold that one for parts when a drunk tailended me and buckled the frame on both sides. But my favorite 63 was a SS HT with a blueprinted 350 that was good for around the same power. Put a lot of miles on that one until the body and frame rotted out.

Carl


I would tend to agree with you Carl. I looked at the car several times, and it didn't seem right, but there it was. Same story with a 64 Impala. It had a 3 speed automatic shifter column. Looked factory. Didn't think 400 turbos were available in 64.

I don't understand all I know. Shocked
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kent Kershaw
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 752
Location: Charlotte,NC

Posted: Jul Tue 07, 2009 6:25 am  Reply with quote

35Z5 wrote:
Yeah most everyone thinks of the 409 Impala SS as a screaming, hairy chested, monster but a fellow I know had one with 340Hp(I believe thats correct) hydraulic cam engine and a Powerglide... While it wasn't slow, wasn't a match for my 428 Cobra Jet Torino...

Tom


That's what I had, 340 HP, Powerglide, 2 door hardtop and fender skirts. The 340 HP version was called the "Police Intercepter Option" and it handled like an aircraft carrier. This was in the late '80s. It was no slouch and it would still pass just about anything but a gas station and just about snap your neck doing it. Man, it was fun.
View user's profile Send private message
Burnt Fingers
Member


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 5683
Location: New Hampshire

Posted: Jul Tue 07, 2009 2:03 pm  Reply with quote

Back in the days Before Wife and when I had spare money available I bought a new 64 GTO convertible with the 389, tripower, 4spd and posi. It never lost to a 409.

After Wife I was relegated to the back of car lots and Sunday papers for my transportation. Of course the little princess and brats had 2-3 year old transportation at their beck and call.

Wife hasnt changed, currently tooling around in a 07 Volvo Turbo. Daddy wants a NEW toy and is waiting on a 2010 Camaro LS3.

Life is too short to waste on an econobox. Laughing

Carl
View user's profile Send private message
Kevin Clark
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 488
Location: Madison Hts, Mi

Posted: Jul Wed 08, 2009 2:04 am  Reply with quote

Burnt Fingers wrote:
What is it with Prius drivers running with the lights off during the day? Is it another way of squeezing the best mpg? Id say that 50% of the ones I see are running dark.

Carl


These economy cars do inspire some geekery. My Metro, I do the same thing, one click up on the parking brake turns off the day time running lights without engaging the brakes. Brakes start engaging at three clicks. Tires at 40 lbs, timing advanced 6 degrees, synthetic lubes in engine and transaxle. Audiovox cruise control to maintain a steady 60-65 mph. Flat surface metal wheel covers. Next thing to do would probably be some aero mods, but, at the current 50 mpg, seems good enough for now at the current gas prices. It's a type of performance, just a different realm. Mpg's instead of horsepower and et's.
_________________
He who has nothing, wants nothing, has all the power in the world.
View user's profile Send private message
terry h
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 7367
Location: Valley City ND USA

Posted: Jul Wed 08, 2009 3:33 am  Reply with quote

Burnt Fingers wrote:
Back in the days Before Wife and when I had spare money available I bought a new 64 GTO convertible with the 389, tripower, 4spd and posi. It never lost to a 409.

After Wife I was relegated to the back of car lots and Sunday papers for my transportation. Of course the little princess and brats had 2-3 year old transportation at their beck and call.

Wife hasnt changed, currently tooling around in a 07 Volvo Turbo. Daddy wants a NEW toy and is waiting on a 2010 Camaro LS3.

Life is too short to waste on an econobox. Laughing

Carl


Yes, the 389 had good power. I think about 1966 Motor Trend or some such Mag. road tested the high performance cars of the day, and the GTO was a shave better.

So many happenings are the "You had to be there" variety. A 63 Olds Starfire cleaned a GTO back in the day. Hard to believe I know.

I drove some strong 442 Olds and and Buick Gran Sport that would easily have bested my 396. Buick and Olds were more expensive. Didn't see many on the road of the muscle category.

Yes Carl, life is short. An econo box won't make it longer....It will SEEM longer.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Burnt Fingers
Member


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 5683
Location: New Hampshire

Posted: Jul Wed 08, 2009 3:19 pm  Reply with quote

Terry, many of the 64-66 GTO's were automatics which was a 2 spd version of the Jetaway. It wasnt until the TH-400 came along plus aftermarket shift kits that the automatic versions could perform.

A 425 nailhead with dual quads and TH-400 was a force to be reckoned with as was the 425 Olds.

The older design (from the 1949 303) 394 Olds never really impressed me but the Jetaway was a dog and little could be done to improve it. I have a 57 in storage with the 371, J-2, and Jetaway that makes more noise than progress going down the road.

But in those full size power war years the 413 Wedge with dual quads on the long rams was king. A friend had a 63 New Yorker wagon with that setup that simply ate up any of the heavyweights of the day. We used it to tow my GTO to the drags up in Sanford, ME after I extensively modified the engine in 65, M&H cheater slicks, and more.

With that backround there is no way I could be dragged into an econobox unless it is a hearse Laughing which would be the ultimate insult Crying or Very sad

Carl
View user's profile Send private message
terry h
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 7367
Location: Valley City ND USA

Posted: Jul Wed 08, 2009 4:49 pm  Reply with quote

Seems like we've had similar stuff over time. (J-2 etc.) My stuff was generally old when I got it.

Some differences though; Never saw or drove an older GTO with an automatic. All 4 speed. The J-2 Olds was half installed in a 55 Pontiac 2 door. Had a 3 speed stick. My uncles had 55 Pontiacs in their time. One was a stick. Olds vin. 1955 was owned by a friend. Had a 3 speed stick. A 57 Pontiac, same story.

Those older cars went a lot better with standard transmissions.

You are probably more metro., so an automatic was more popular.
Here, many of us learned to drive a grain truck early on. I may have been 9 or 10 when I started crunching gears in a 33 Ford truck. Common thing in farm country back then. Could drive legally on the roads adjacent to our land. Licenses were issued when you turned 14 if you were a farm kid. Just for work. Don't get caught in town on Saturday night though.

With that background, we tended to shun failure prone automatics when we shopped for our first cars.

Prius; Are they automatic or gear transmissions? Gears used to save gas. Their complexity makes me uneasy. Fear of failure. Fear of severe wallet ache too.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Burnt Fingers
Member


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 5683
Location: New Hampshire

Posted: Jul Wed 08, 2009 8:06 pm  Reply with quote

Quote:
Prius; Are they automatic or gear transmissions? Gears used to save gas. Their complexity makes me uneasy. Fear of failure. Fear of severe wallet ache too.


I believe they are CVT and that was mentioned a few pages back. That is 1920's technology and also used on some old garden tractors. I had a 60's Sunbeam tractor ages ago with CVT, what a PITA.

Carl
View user's profile Send private message
terry h
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 7367
Location: Valley City ND USA

Posted: Jul Wed 08, 2009 10:07 pm  Reply with quote

CVT. I am guessing that means constantly variable transmission. I missed that.
Our old swathers had a big short belt on pulleys that had variable sheaves. Push lever forward to increase speed. Bring back and the machine would stop.
Prius must work on the same principle without belt.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
OZ132HOME
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 4141
Location: La Porte, IN, USA

Posted: Jul Mon 13, 2009 4:44 pm  Reply with quote

Actually, the planetary gearset and accompanying gearset are not variable at all, but fixed ratio. "ICE" (Internal Combustion Engine) Electric Motor/Generators and wheels are all solidly connected together at all times through the Planetary gearset and differential. No clutch or torque converter. No drive belts. No more chain drive. Fewer moving parts than a conventional ride.
The "CVT" action actually is performed by the Electronics--computer and inverter. because the torque curve of an electric motor is pretty much opposite of that for an ICE (max torque at stall) they use the electric motor for acceleration.

It's all very clever and elegant:
http://priuschat.com/forums/ge ... -flow.html


Last edited by OZ132HOME on Jul Tue 14, 2009 12:10 pm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Peter
Moderator


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 5057
Location: Indy

Posted: Jul Mon 13, 2009 5:01 pm  Reply with quote

Hey Oz,

I think I saw your car at Lansing. Red, Indiana plate, was parked 2-3 cars down from my vehicle (blue Pontiac Vibe with two kayaks on the top). Nice looking car if it was yours. Sorry I didn't see you during the show.

peter
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
OZ132HOME
Member


Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 4141
Location: La Porte, IN, USA

Posted: Jul Mon 13, 2009 5:47 pm  Reply with quote

That was most probably us.
We didn't stay as long as usual. Left friday noon.
Was a bit disappointed in our MPG for the trip.
Only got 48.
Around town its better than on the highway. Usually get 50.
The wife is a bit lead footed, and so am I, so it doesn't reflect on the car.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Antique Radio Forums Forum Index -> Radio Clubhouse All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 5 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post in this forum
Only registered users can edit or delete their posts in this forum

Privacy Policy :: Powered by phpBB